Ohio’s Issue 2: What You Need To Know

“Shall the law be approved?”

It’s a simple question that voters will see on ballots across Ohio on Tuesday. Their answers will write another chapter around one of the most divisive issues of the 2011 campaign season, a political battle over Issue 2 and the collective bargaining rights of public employees.

Here are some of the basics:

The history: Issue 2 is a referendum that provides a bookend to an earlier piece of state legislation, Ohio’s Senate Bill 5, which was passed by the state legislature and signed into law by Gov. John Kasich on March 31. SB5 limits the collective bargaining rights of Ohio’s 360,000 public employees.

Among the mandates of SB5: It says public employees must pay for at least 15 percent of their health care premiums, prohibits union members from negotiating benefits, makes strikes by union members illegal and emphasizes merit versus seniority when mulling promotions.

The buildup: Union organizers gathered enough signatures to place a repeal of SB5 on the November ballot. At the end of August – five months after signing the bill into law — Gov. Kasich sought a compromise on SB5 that would strike down some provisions in exchange for removing the referendum, now known as Issue 2, from the ballot.

Organizers of the anti-SB5 group We Are Ohio told the governor they would not compromise on piecemeal provisions in the law. They wanted it repealed in its entirety before they would negotiate. An August 30 deadline passed. No compromise was reached.

What happens Tuesday: Polling places are open in Ohio from 6:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. ET. A “yes” vote on Issue 2 means a voter approves of the SB5 law. A “no” vote means a voter rejects the law.

What comes next: Two weeks ago, a Quinnipiac Poll showed voters could reject the measure by a 25-point margin. If Issue 2 is defeated and SB5 is repealed, that hardly means the debate is finished.

Many Ohio politicians have indicated that the Republican-led legislature would introduce parts of the bill individually – while recent polls have showed weak support for SB5 overall, they have also shown strong support for certain segments of it.

The Columbus Dispatch reported Monday those provisions could include, “limits on how much local governments would be required to pay toward employees’ health-insurance costs or on picking up portions of employees’ pension contributions.“

Broader implications: Results of the Ohio vote are being closely watched across the Midwest. In Wisconsin,a fight of similarly fierce volume broke out over legislation that limited the collective-bargaining rights of public employees, and many experts will draw parallels between the Ohio results and ongoing efforts in Wisconsin to recall Gov. Scott Walker.

But there are clear distinctions between the states and the way they operate, explains the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Public Policy Polling’s Tom Jensen tells the newspaper it’s partly a referendum on the governors.

“I think that if the (Ohio law) really does get rejected by the kind of margins the polls are suggesting, it’s a reflection of the fact that John Kasich is a lot more unpopular than Scott Walker is,” he said.

 

  • Kent mcmmillen

    If you are a non-union worker, be aware that if union workers are forced into a wage cut, it will run down non-union wages also. Why isn’t anyone concerned about the coercive power of the wealthy, the medical community, and and banks?

    • guest

      Its funny how lazy union workers usually are until they see their free ride is almost over. Time to pay what the rest of us pay for health care and earn your promotions on merit not just because you have been employed longer.

      • Punisherrobb

        Union workers are workers we do not want to take anything away from anyone else. Why not have a contract. Rules are not meant to be changed for any reason or any ones whim. Our forefathers died for these rights. I could only imagine what wages and benefits or retirement would be like for everyone if the unions would not have fought for you. Its funny how ignorant and  jealous non union people are!  Isnt that merit working out for you.  Wait until you get a little older or slower or make a little more and a new boss comes along we will see how having no proper procedure or bargaining rights or seniority works out for you!  Union workers are regular blue collar workers who united together! We are the reason there is overtime, 40 hour work weeks, better wages, retirement, and healthcare at all!

        • Rsr

          no YOU  are the reason our cities and governments our going broke and bankrupt.
          your predecesors are the reason there is 40 hr work weeks  and such. You guys are the reason our country is going down the tubes. Cause you just vote Democrat right down the line. just to get your union rights. think about it, or does your union have to tell you to think about it first !

    • Punisherrobb

      How do union workers take away or hurt non union workers? Anything union workers earn helps other workers.  The rich owners push, bully, and brainwash nonunion employees because they do not want you to have rights.

      • Rsr

        Unions teach me to not want to be in a union. 
        I like to work for myself not for union bosses, and people who steal , and fight. 
        Unions try and take money and food out of non-union families by strong hold and picket jobs that they ( unions ) could not get. IF they don’t get a job they want , they cry and complain and picket. Way to treat your fellow Americans, Unions. Just so you know  Non-union workers have children , and families to feed to.

        Oh, but you don’t care about that. Unions are all about them. Nothing else matters.

  • JJohn V.

    As a tax paying non-union worker I’m irritated by three main elements of their structure: 1) No one is covering my health insurance increased premiums. 2) My tax money and others should not go to Unions to contribute political campaigns that I don’t agree. 3) Union members should be looking at that waste of the dues they pay to leverage their benefits instead of expecting taxpayers to cover them up and above the waste.

    • Punisherrobb

      Your tax money does not go to unions at all.  I am a union worker and I have to sign a letter if I want  1 percent of my dues to go to any campaign. All union workers at one time were workers who became united just like the United States of America There is no difference between union and non union only the fact that when workers come together they bargain and become unionized  and help everyone by setting a standard. Non-union workers are not interested in anything except taking away pay, and bargaining rights and benefits from union workers.  How does that help anyone?