<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Changing Gears &#187; blotters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.changinggears.info/tag/blotters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.changinggears.info</link>
	<description>Changing Gears is a public media project about the future of the industrial Midwest. Each week, reporters Dan Bobkoff in Cleveland, Niala Boodhoo in Chicago and Kate Davidson in Ann Arbor cover issues of interest to the Great Lakes region. Changing Gears also sponsors public events and conversations.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 18:56:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/3.0.1" -->
	<itunes:summary>The Changing Gears Podcast is produced by Changing Gears, a public media project looking at the future of the industrial Midwest. Each week, Senior Editor Micki Maynard looks at the project&#039;s latest stories by Dan Bobkoff in Cleveland, Niala Boodhoo in Chicago and Kate Davidson in Ann Arbor.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Changing Gears</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.changinggears.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/ChangingGears_iTunes_Logo.jpg" />
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Changing Gears</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>changinggears@umich.edu</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<managingEditor>changinggears@umich.edu (Changing Gears)</managingEditor>
	<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; Changing Gears 2011</copyright>
	<itunes:subtitle>Remaking the Manufacturing Belt</itunes:subtitle>
	
	<itunes:category text="News &amp; Politics" />
		<item>
		<title>Blotting Update: Detroit Wants To Sell You This Lot</title>
		<link>http://www.changinggears.info/2012/03/13/blotting-update-detroit-wants-to-sell-you-this-lot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.changinggears.info/2012/03/13/blotting-update-detroit-wants-to-sell-you-this-lot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Davidson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blotters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blotting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Changing Gears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Davidson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vacant lots]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.changinggears.info/?p=13580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently, the phone has been ringing off the hook over at Detroit’s planning department.  It&#8217;s all because of a few lines uttered by Mayor Dave Bing in his State of the City address last week. (You&#8217;ll find them about 30 minutes in.) “This week we sent out over 500 letters to property owners in Hubbard &#8230; <a href="http://www.changinggears.info/2012/03/13/blotting-update-detroit-wants-to-sell-you-this-lot/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="module image alignleft" style="width: 300px;"><a href="http://www.changinggears.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/DSC_1049.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-13586 " style="border: 1px solid black;" title="DSC_1049" src="http://www.changinggears.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/DSC_1049-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a><p class="caption">Sharon McClinton cares for the vacant land around her house. Detroit is trying to make it easier for residents like her to buy that land, too.</p></div>
<p>Apparently, the phone has been ringing off the hook over at Detroit’s planning department.  It&#8217;s all because of a <a href="http://www.detroitmi.gov/DepartmentsandAgencies/MayorsOffice/StateoftheCity2012/Viewthe2012StateoftheCityAddress.aspx">few lines uttered by Mayor Dave Bing</a> in his <a href="http://www.detroitmi.gov/DepartmentsandAgencies/MayorsOffice/StateoftheCity2012.aspx">State of the City</a> address last week. <em>(You&#8217;ll find them about 30 minutes in.)</em></p>
<p>“This week we sent out over 500 letters to property owners in Hubbard Farms, Springwells Village and Southwest Detroit,” he announced, “telling them if they own a home adjacent to a vacant city-owned lot, they can purchase this lot for a mere $200.”</p>
<p>“No coming downtown,” the mayor said.  “No added bureaucracy. The city will mail back the deed.”</p>
<p>The initiative is a response to the overwhelming problem of abandoned property in Detroit.  It’s a problem we explored in our stories about Detroit “blotters” &#8212; <a href="http://www.changinggears.info/2011/11/09/empty-places-its-not-squatting-its-blotting/">which you can see here</a> and <a href="http://www.npr.org/2011/12/05/142341520/blotting-not-squatting-in-detroit-neighborhoods">here</a>.</p>
<p>Blotting describes what happens when homeowners annex the vacant lot, or lots, next door. They create expanded properties, between the size of a lot and a city block.  Sometimes, residents can purchase these side lots.  Often, they’re constrained by bureaucracy or money, so they may just throw up a fence to ward off the dangers of abandonment.<span id="more-13580"></span></p>
<p>Many cities have programs to encourage residents to buy vacant side lots at discounted prices.  Detroit has one too, but it’s been slow and unwieldy.  It can take years for residents to buy the lot next door.  Considering that Detroit owns tens of thousands of vacant land parcels, that wasn’t fast enough.</p>
<p>So on Friday, hundreds of Detroiters got the letters, written in English and Spanish. The city offered to sell homeowners the vacant lot next door for $200.</p>
<p>This new White Picket Fence Program is basically the same as the existing adjacent lot program.  What’s different is that instead of waiting for residents to come to them, city planners targeted certain neighborhoods, pro-actively identifying eligible lots.</p>
<p>It’s a kind of pre-approval on the city’s part, as well as a tacit acknowledgment that many residents don’t know their options or have given up.</p>
<p>Greg Holman, the Special Projects Coordinator at the planning department, describes himself as someone with “a weird passion for vacant, adjacent side lots.”  He’s been watching the responses come in.</p>
<p>As of 12:15 pm today, he’s received 20 completed applications in the mail.  It&#8217;s just been a few days since the city&#8217;s letters went out.  It shows how interested many Detroiters are in owning and caring for the land around them.</p>
<p>Though the expedited side lot program targets Southwest Detroit, Bing hopes it will be replicated in other areas.  It certainly won’t solve the problem of vacancy in Detroit.  But Greg Holman sums up the prevailing spirit: “Small changes can make big waves, is my theory.”</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.changinggears.info/2012/03/13/blotting-update-detroit-wants-to-sell-you-this-lot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<georss:point>42.3314285 -83.0457535</georss:point><media:content url="http://www.changinggears.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/DSC_1049.jpg" medium="image" height="2000" width="3008"><media:thumbnail url="http://www.changinggears.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/DSC_1049-60x60.jpg" height="60" width="60" /></media:content>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>EMPTY PLACES: It&#8217;s Not Squatting &#8230; It&#8217;s Blotting</title>
		<link>http://www.changinggears.info/2011/11/09/empty-places-its-not-squatting-its-blotting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.changinggears.info/2011/11/09/empty-places-its-not-squatting-its-blotting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 12:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Davidson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blotters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blotting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Changing Gears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Empty Places]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Davidson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.changinggears.info/?p=9966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DETROIT &#8212; Our Changing Gears project is looking at the challenges of the region’s empty places this month.  For many people, the most threatening emptiness isn’t a shuttered factory.  It’s the abandoned property next door.  But in Detroit, some residents are using that emptiness to quietly reshape their neighborhoods.  They’re annexing vacant lots around them, &#8230; <a href="http://www.changinggears.info/2011/11/09/empty-places-its-not-squatting-its-blotting/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="module image centered" style="width: 620px;"><a href="http://www.changinggears.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/DSC_1022.jpg"><img class="size-large wp-image-9973" style="border: 1px solid black;" title="DSC_1022" src="http://www.changinggears.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/DSC_1022-620x412.jpg" alt="" width="620" height="412" /></a><p class="credit">Kate Davidson</p><p class="caption">&quot;Blotters&quot; are turning Detroit&#39;s empty spaces into family compounds.</p></div>
<p>DETROIT &#8212; Our Changing Gears project is looking at the challenges of the region’s empty places this month.  For many people, the most threatening emptiness isn’t a shuttered factory.  It’s the abandoned property next door.  But in Detroit, some residents are using that emptiness to quietly reshape their neighborhoods.  They’re annexing vacant lots around them, buying them when they can or just putting up a fence.</p>
<p>They’re not squatters … they’re <em>blotters</em>.<span id="more-9966"></span></p>
<p>Blot isn’t a bad word.  <a title="Interboro" href="http://www.cudc.kent.edu/publications/urban_infill/cities_growing_smaller/cities_growing_smaller_chapter_04_screen.pdf" target="_blank">A design firm coined the term</a> several years ago.  Academia ran with it.</p>
<p>“Blots<strong> </strong>are properties between the size of an entire block and just a lot.  So, they are consolidations of multiple lots,” says Margaret Dewar, a professor of urban and regional planning at the <a title="Taubman College" href="http://www.tcaup.umich.edu/">University of Michigan</a> who’s mapped blots.</p>
<p>So, families are creating compounds of multiple lots.  Big deal, right?  Well, keep in mind Detroit was built tightly packed with working class homes.  It sliced up blocks with a very quick knife.  So as the city lost 60 percent of its population, it left these gaping holes in the genetic makeup of neighborhoods.  Blotters aren’t waiting for the city to fix that.</p>
<p>“I call it an everyday remaking,” Dewar says.  “It’s every day there’s a little step in this direction of remaking by people who are pretty invisible.  But over time it becomes a dominant feature of the city.”</p>
<p>People like space.  Margaret Dewar sampled tax-reverted properties resold by the city, up to 2005.  She found more than a quarter were bought by the homeowner next door.</p>
<p>Still, the easiest way to find blotters in Detroit is to look for a very long fence on a lonely street.</p>
<div class="module image right" style="width: 300px;"><a href="http://www.changinggears.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/DSC_1000.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9970" style="border: 1px solid black;" title="DSC_1000" src="http://www.changinggears.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/DSC_1000-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a><p class="credit">Kate Davidson</p><p class="caption">Paula Besheers and her son Paul Browne tried in vain to buy the empty lot right next door.</p></div>
<p>Behind one of them is the house Paula Besheers’ grandfather bought in 1925.</p>
<p>“This has been here in the family for four generations,” she says.  “So it’s like 86 years.”</p>
<p>And then, also fenced off, the four empty lots.  Well, not exactly empty…</p>
<p>“I planted in some cherry trees and two apple trees,” says Besheers’ son Paul Browne, who lives a few blocks from the family home.  “I’m attempting to grow some grape vines.  I’ll let you know when I figure out how to get that going good.”</p>
<p>The little orchard, the raspberry patch, the gardens &#8212; they’re a relief from the pit bulls, the burnt house and the emptiness across the street. But there’s a catch.</p>
<p>It turns out, the only lot the family actually owns is the one farthest from the house.  HUD sold it for about a hundred bucks.  Browne says the last he checked, the city owned the next lot in, the county the next one, and the city the one after that.  He says the family tried to buy the middle lots years ago, but were told no.  He says it’s probably time to try again.</p>
<p>“They want to sell it, more than willing to buy it off of them,” he says.</p>
<p>So why go to all this trouble?</p>
<p>“’Cause we live next door to it,” Browne says.  “If you go up the next block from here you’ll see what it would look like.  Just overgrown brush piles.  Trash.  Car parts.   And it’s only from stubbornness and perseverance that keeps it from becoming a debris pile.”</p>
<div class="module image centered" style="width: 502px;"><a href="http://www.changinggears.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/DSC_1007.jpg"><img class="size-large wp-image-9971" style="border: 1px solid black;" title="DSC_1007" src="http://www.changinggears.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/DSC_1007-620x412.jpg" alt="" width="502" height="334" /></a><p class="credit">Kate Davidson</p><p class="caption">The family home</p></div>
<div class="module image centered" style="width: 502px;"><a href="http://www.changinggears.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/DSC_1021.jpg"><img class="size-large wp-image-9975" style="border: 1px solid black;" title="DSC_1021" src="http://www.changinggears.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/DSC_1021-620x410.jpg" alt="" width="502" height="332" /></a><p class="credit">Kate Davidson</p><p class="caption">Across the street</p></div>
<p>So should cities like Detroit make it easier for residents to take over the vacant space around them?  Detroit’s new planning director Rob Anderson says, basically, yes.</p>
<p>To be clear, Detroit, <a title="Cleveland Sideyard Expansion" href="http://reimaginingcleveland.org/files/2011/02/IdeasToAction_Sideyard_Expansion.pdf" target="_blank">Cleveland</a>, <a title="Chicago ANLAP" href="http://www.cityofchicago.org/content/dam/city/depts/dcd/banners/ANLAPfactsheet.pdf" target="_blank">Chicago</a>, even <a title="New Orleans" href="http://blog.nola.com/politics/print.html?entry=/2011/06/anti-blight_program_lot_next_d.html" target="_blank">post-Katrina New Orleans</a> all have adjacent lot programs on the books already.  In Cleveland, a homeowner can buy the lot next door for as little as a dollar.  In Detroit, two hundred dollars.  Chicago, a thousand.</p>
<p>Rob Anderson says, most importantly, when a homeowner buys the lot next door, they’re taking responsibility for the neighborhood.  They’re also putting land back on the tax rolls.</p>
<p>“Then that’s one parcel that we can rely on a citizen to take care of that the city really can’t afford to take care of,” he says.</p>
<p>Anderson says Detroit has sold about a thousand of these lots in recent years.</p>
<p>Still, the city owns a staggering 60,000 plus parcels of land, most of it vacant.  So the planning department just started reevaluating the adjacent lot program in southwest Detroit, to see how to expedite and promote it.</p>
<p>“We think it’s a tool that really is well suited for this area that we’re working in,” Anderson says.  “And if we can get it right here, it’s easily transferred to the rest of the community.”</p>
<p>Has the tool been underutilized in the past?</p>
<p>“Looks like it to me,” he says.</p>
<p>The program has inherent limitations.  The scale of abandonment in Detroit means many homeowners aren’t just worried about the lot next door.  It’s also the one after that, the one after that, and, in Paula Besheers’ case, the one after that.  But only the vacant parcel right next door meets the guidelines of the city’s current adjacent lot program.  Residents can still buy multiple lots, but they have to go through a different process.</p>
<p>Then, there’s the time factor.  As I was leaving the planning department, an aide mentioned it can take years for residents to get through the bureaucracy of buying the lot next door.  Rob Anderson was shocked.  He said the department’s new goal will be 30 days.  That would bring Detroit in line with cities like Cleveland and Chicago, where it only takes a few months to expand your yard.</p>
<p>*<em>Inform our coverage: <a href="http://www.publicinsightnetwork.org/form/changing-gears/3eefe255143d/have-you-taken-over-empty-or-abandoned-land-near-you">Have you taken over empty or abandoned land near you-or know someone who has? </a></em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.changinggears.info/2011/11/09/empty-places-its-not-squatting-its-blotting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	<georss:point>42.3314285 -83.0457535</georss:point>	<enclosure url="http://www.changinggears.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/EMPTY_BLOTTING_MIX_WEB.mp3" length="1" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:keywords>blotters,blotting,Changing Gears,Detroit,Empty Places,Kate Davidson</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>DETROIT -- Our Changing Gears project is looking at the challenges of the region’s empty places this month.  For many people, the most threatening emptiness isn’t a shuttered factory.  It’s the abandoned property next door.  But in Detroit,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>DETROIT -- Our Changing Gears project is looking at the challenges of the region’s empty places this month.  For many people, the most threatening emptiness isn’t a shuttered factory.  It’s the abandoned property next door.  But in Detroit, some residents are using that emptiness to quietly reshape their neighborhoods.  They’re annexing vacant lots around them, buying them when they can or just putting up a fence.

They’re not squatters … they’re blotters.

Blot isn’t a bad word.  A design firm coined the term several years ago.  Academia ran with it.

“Blots are properties between the size of an entire block and just a lot.  So, they are consolidations of multiple lots,” says Margaret Dewar, a professor of urban and regional planning at the University of Michigan who’s mapped blots.

So, families are creating compounds of multiple lots.  Big deal, right?  Well, keep in mind Detroit was built tightly packed with working class homes.  It sliced up blocks with a very quick knife.  So as the city lost 60 percent of its population, it left these gaping holes in the genetic makeup of neighborhoods.  Blotters aren’t waiting for the city to fix that.

“I call it an everyday remaking,” Dewar says.  “It’s every day there’s a little step in this direction of remaking by people who are pretty invisible.  But over time it becomes a dominant feature of the city.”

People like space.  Margaret Dewar sampled tax-reverted properties resold by the city, up to 2005.  She found more than a quarter were bought by the homeowner next door.

Still, the easiest way to find blotters in Detroit is to look for a very long fence on a lonely street.



Behind one of them is the house Paula Besheers’ grandfather bought in 1925.

“This has been here in the family for four generations,” she says.  “So it’s like 86 years.”

And then, also fenced off, the four empty lots.  Well, not exactly empty…

“I planted in some cherry trees and two apple trees,” says Besheers’ son Paul Browne, who lives a few blocks from the family home.  “I’m attempting to grow some grape vines.  I’ll let you know when I figure out how to get that going good.”

The little orchard, the raspberry patch, the gardens -- they’re a relief from the pit bulls, the burnt house and the emptiness across the street. But there’s a catch.

It turns out, the only lot the family actually owns is the one farthest from the house.  HUD sold it for about a hundred bucks.  Browne says the last he checked, the city owned the next lot in, the county the next one, and the city the one after that.  He says the family tried to buy the middle lots years ago, but were told no.  He says it’s probably time to try again.

“They want to sell it, more than willing to buy it off of them,” he says.

So why go to all this trouble?

“’Cause we live next door to it,” Browne says.  “If you go up the next block from here you’ll see what it would look like.  Just overgrown brush piles.  Trash.  Car parts.   And it’s only from stubbornness and perseverance that keeps it from becoming a debris pile.”





So should cities like Detroit make it easier for residents to take over the vacant space around them?  Detroit’s new planning director Rob Anderson says, basically, yes.

To be clear, Detroit, Cleveland, Chicago, even post-Katrina New Orleans all have adjacent lot programs on the books already.  In Cleveland, a homeowner can buy the lot next door for as little as a dollar.  In Detroit, two hundred dollars.  Chicago, a thousand.

Rob Anderson says, most importantly, when a homeowner buys the lot next door, they’re taking responsibility for the neighborhood.  They’re also putting land back on the tax rolls.

“Then that’s one parcel that we can rely on a citizen to take care of that the city really can’t afford to take care of,” he says.

Anderson says Detroit has sold about a thousand of these lots in recent years.

Still, the city owns a staggering 60,000 plus parcels of land,</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Changing Gears</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
<media:content url="http://www.changinggears.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/DSC_1022.jpg" medium="image" height="2000" width="3008"><media:thumbnail url="http://www.changinggears.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/DSC_1022-60x60.jpg" height="60" width="60" /></media:content>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
